- A thousand of the 62,000 registered voters in Georgia’s Glynn County received jury summons for the trial of three white men charged with killing Ahmaud Arbery last February.
- Judge Timothy Walmsley barred media outlets from publishing identifying information on jurors, and assured jurors repeatedly that anonymity is being maintained by the court.
- A potential juror said this to court: “Any verdict, whether guilty or not, is going be unpopular with certain people. Maybe I’d even feel unsafe, I don’t know.”
BRUNSWICK, Ga. — Would-be jurors in the murder trial of the three men charged with killing 25-year-old Ahmaud Arbery expressed concerns this week about remaining anonymous should they be selected to serve – particularly given the size of the community and intense public interest in the high-profile trial.
One thousand out of 62,000 registered votersThe case was brought to Glynn county’s attention by jury summonses. The judge hopes to narrow the jury pool to a smaller group of 64 and, eventually, to 16 – 12 jurors and four alternates.
This is made more complicated by the factmultiple prospective jurors have told the court they know Arbery, the defendants, potential witnesses, other prospective jurors and some of the local figures involved in the case. Some said they worried they would be identified as a juror in the press and feared they would face personal repercussions after rendering a verdict.
Self-defense or a ‘lynching’ 3 Georgia men go on trial in the 2020 murder of Ahmaud Arbery
“I don’t want to have to relocate because of something that goes wrong,” one prospective juror said Monday.
Under questioning by lawyers for the defendants, another prospective juror expressed similar concerns: “Any verdict, guilty or innocent, is going to be unpopular with some people,” she said. “Maybe I’d even feel unsafe, I don’t know.”
One juror told the court she was concerned about “making sure my name is out of the news.”
“It’s a small enough town,” another prospective juror told lawyers for the defendants Thursday. “I think it would be naïve to think there couldn’t be real-world repercussions.”
Judge Timothy Walmsley has barred the media from releasing identifying information about jurors and repeatedly assured jurors the court is working to maintain their anonymity.
Anonymous juries are uncommon. But due to social media, the ease of internet searches, and concerns over juror safety, the practice could become more common – a shift some legal scholars say could jeopardize transparency and the need for more diverse juries.
Brunswick is predominantly Black, but sits in the overwhelmingly white Glynn County. The demographic composition of the jury will be closely monitored due to the complex racial issues in this case.
Arbery, who was Black, was fatally shot in February of last year while out jogging in the Satilla Shores neighborhood of Brunswick. Three white men – Greg McMichael, 65, his son Travis, 35, and their neighbor William “Roddie” Bryan, 52 – stand accused of his murder.
Ahmaud Abery’s death: Where and when did it happen?
The defendants’ connections in the small community have complicated the case from the outset. The first prosecutor assigned to the proceedings, Brunswick District Attorney Jackie Johnson, had to recuse herself because Greg McMichael previously worked as an investigator for her office and as a Glynn County police officer. She has since been indicted for misconduct in the case.
The next prosecutor, Waycross Judicial Circuit District Attorney George Barnhill, also had to recuse himself because he was recommended by Johnson, who failed to disclose she asked him to advise police on Arbery’s death.
In court late Wednesday, Kevin Gough, Bryan’s defense attorney, called Brunswick a “fishbowl” where everybody knows everybody. He even appeared to recognize one of the jurors.
First week of jury selection a local affair as a cast of characters paraded through the court: A baker, a teacher, a security guard, a housekeeper, a crane operator, a hair stylist, a server.
Many said at least one person was involved in this case including defendants, partners, and lawyers. One said they knew someone from a local Rotary Club. Two claimed that the witness cut their hair. One of them said that they were neighbors with the defendant.
On a questionnaire, one juror stated that Roddie’s spouse and his colleagues are “best friends”.
One juror said a defendant is “a friend of my father’s and he’s been over to our house multiple times.”
Thursday’s prospective juror stated that he had known each defendant “for many years.” According to him, he has known McMichaels for over 20 years.
He told Linda Dunikoski, a prosecutor, that he felt like he knew them too well. “I’m trying to be sincere.”
To your inbox, from our editor:Nicole Carroll is the editor-in-chief and takes you inside the newsroom to bring you this week’s newsletter.
Arbery was known to multiple potential jurors. One of his classmates went to school with him. One went to school together with his parents. Another said that his son was a football player with Arbery.
In courtrooms, jurors often recognized each other. One woman said she knew six other jurors, including her son, a former student and current and former coworkers.
Some potential jurors, despite their different degrees of knowledge about the case and the people involved in it, said that they would be neutral if they were placed on the panel.
Thursday afternoon, a potential juror told court that she had known the defendant for thirty years. The judge asked the woman if she would remain neutral. She replied “yes”.
At the moment, it was unclear if the woman would continue to the next phase of the process.
The jury selection process will continue Monday morning.
Share Your Comment Below